Post

#特朗普改称超级智能，AI监管分歧升级 At the United Nations General Assembly, Trump renamed AI as "superintelligence" and opposed global unified regulation. The next day, Sanders and Casar proposed a bill to permanently ban the development and deployment of superintelligence, suspending some advanced AI development until a federal regulatory framework is established. Jensen Huang stepped in to mediate, saying AI labs should test models and take safety responsibility but opposed a one-size-fits-all approach. The division is clear. One side wants to accelerate, the other wants to brake, and centrists want to find a balance. The impact on the crypto space is not in regulation itself but in computing power. Bitcoin's underlying narrative is the computing power economy. The larger the AI capital expenditure, the stronger the demand for computing power, the more fiat credit is burned, and the stronger BTC's non-sovereign logic becomes. But if regulation really suppresses AI development, slowing computing power demand, assets related to computing power will be under pressure in the short term, and BTC will hardly be immune. The problem now is that no one knows how it will end. Whether Trump's executive power or Sanders' legislative proposal lands first will directly determine AI's pace. In the short term, uncertainty will suppress risk appetite, with BTC fluctuating around 85,000 and the direction still unclear. Don't rush to bet. Wait until the bill progresses and regulatory boundaries become clear. The computing power race won't stop, but the pace may change. BTC is driven by long-term logic; short-term volatility must be endured. Do you think AI should accelerate or brake? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC $ETH $ZEC